Constitutionally speaking, how could Petitioner retain an attorney when she was forced to plead guilty, in Judge Kathleen Satula court, to a horrendous crime that she did not commit? Equally important, the city of Cleveland is not Petitioner's jurisdiction, East Cleveland is. How then can this case be respected as legal?

1. Why would Judge Gwin, in the Federal Court in Cleveland, Ohio, and Judge Guy, Judge Cook, and Judge Griffin, of Appeals Court in Cincinnati, Ohio, review 101 pages of transcripts, Ohio Revised Laws, timed stamped letters from the courts, they all said that the exhibits were "claims and allegations"?

2. A substantial question is, filing complaints, with the Better Business Bureau, Ohio Attorney General, Ohio Board of Realtors, equate to the horrific crime of "stalking and menacing?" Or is it a black senior citizen 72 years old practicing her civil right as a citizen of the United States of America??? Or is this "stalking and menacing?"

3. Was it legal for Judge Kathleen Satula to force Petitioner, to get long-lasting injectable medication, simply because she contacted the F.B.I., Federal Bureau of Investigators? In transcripts, Page 9, Satula said if Petitioner did not take the medication (poison). Satula, in a rage demanded Petitioner, to take the medication or go to prison for 18 months. Is "forced drugging legal"? Forced drugging is not legal, in fact it is a crime!

4. Again, was it legal for Probation Officer Lakisha Sharp to force Petitioner to take medication against her will? In transcript, Sharp and Satula worked as a team, breaking the law. "Involuntary treatment" "Forced Drugging" is not legal, the law a person must be, a danger to herself or others. Is contacting the Federal Bureau of Investigators a crime? 18 months prison?

5. Constitutionally speaking, was it legal for Satula to tell David Sarver, that she would use "Hearsay", against Petitioner? Is 'Hearsay' respected in a court of law? "Evidence and Witnesses" 240, "By rule hearsay is not admissible".

6. Judge Gwin cited that Petitioner's case is baseless. Are transcripts, Ohio Revised Code Laws, baseless?? What is factual??? Are Ohio Revised Code laws baseless?

7. Legally speaking, was if legal for Petitioner to have to cases in Cleveland Heights Court and Cleveland Court, and the has resided in East Cleveland since 1966? And she still lives in East Cleveland. Why and how could David Sarver file cases against Shampine while these cities are not her jurisdiction?? More importantly, David Sarver lives in Chesterland. What does Cleveland Heights have to do with it???

8. During an eviction, the client's valuables are to be place in the front lawn. The realtor in this case or the home owner, by Ohio Law are to place the clients furnishings, valuables, on the front lawn not put them and a truck and steal and damage the clients belongings. Is it legal for the realtor to place Petitioners very expensive valuables in a truck and steal and damage her valuables, they kept her valuables overnight. Is this legal?

9. What type of Chief of Police, and Sergeant, are going to leave their office, their jurisdiction, Cleveland Heights, come to the city of East Cleveland, which is not

How could Petitioner retain an attorney when she was forced to plead guilty?