No. 19-7288
John Kelsey Gammell v. United States
IFP
Tags: aiding-and-abetting armed-career-criminal-act burglary burglary-statute categorical-approach generic-definition statutory-elements
Latest Conference:
2020-05-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
In determining whether a burglary conviction based on an aiding and abetting theory qualifies as an enumerated burglary under the ACCA, does the categorical approach apply to both the burglary statute and the aiding and abetting doctrine, such that a burglary conviction based on an overbroad aiding and abetting statute does not constitute generic burglary?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a burglary conviction based on an aiding and abetting theory qualifies as an enumerated burglary under the Armed Career Criminal Act
Docket Entries
2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-17
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2020-04-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 17, 2020.
2020-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 15, 2020 to April 17, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-03-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 15, 2020.
2020-03-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 16, 2020 to April 15, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 16, 2020.
2020-02-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 13, 2020 to March 16, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2020)
Attorneys
John Kelsey Gammell
Rachel K. Paulose — University of St. Thomas School of Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent