No. 19-7272

Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell v. Ralph Diaz, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment compulsory-process constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing fair-trial reasonable-doubt sixth-amendment trial-fairness
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Did the petitioner receive Constitutional effective assistance of trial Court counsel at trial Court answers? YES Appellant answers: NO

2. Did the appellants Constitutional rights to due process and the Compulsory Process violated in the Pre-Trial proceedings. Court answers: No Appellant answers: YES

3. Did the petitioner FRUWL @ For trial that das Fund if ntally Correct, Without prejudice. Trial Court answers: yes Appellant answers: No

4. Is the appellant With the wwidinw in question TAISe A TLeasonable doubt With jurors oF reagonable purdence. Trial Court answers: No Appellant answers: Yes

5. Is \S_ the record SutFicent For the district Court +o make a disposition without holding an eidintiary Waring. Trial Court answers: Yes Appellant answers: No

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner received constitutionally effective assistance of counsel at trial

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-02-03
Waiver of right of respondents Ralph Diaz, CA Dept Corrections & Rehabilitation et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2020)

Attorneys

Kenyatta Q. Mitchell
Kenyatta Q. Mitchell — Petitioner
Ralph Diaz, CA Dept Corrections & Rehabilitation et al.
Robin Helene UrbanskiOffice of the California Attorney General, Respondent