Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell v. Ralph Diaz, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
1. Did the petitioner receive Constitutional effective assistance of trial Court counsel at trial Court answers? YES Appellant answers: NO
2. Did the appellants Constitutional rights to due process and the Compulsory Process violated in the Pre-Trial proceedings. Court answers: No Appellant answers: YES
3. Did the petitioner FRUWL @ For trial that das Fund if ntally Correct, Without prejudice. Trial Court answers: yes Appellant answers: No
4. Is the appellant With the wwidinw in question TAISe A TLeasonable doubt With jurors oF reagonable purdence. Trial Court answers: No Appellant answers: Yes
5. Is \S_ the record SutFicent For the district Court +o make a disposition without holding an eidintiary Waring. Trial Court answers: Yes Appellant answers: No
Whether the petitioner received constitutionally effective assistance of counsel at trial