No. 19-7270
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: dna-evidence due-process evidence exculpatory-evidence fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel procedural-due-process sexual-assault
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provide Mr. Saved with a procedural due process to have exculpatory (DNA) evidence tested, so long as Mr. Saved meets the threshold for such testing, which Mr. Saved submits he did ?
2) Whether the Evidence was insufficient to convict Mr. Saved of sexual assault ?
3) Whether Mr. Saved received ineffective assistance of counsel when counsel failed to test the remaining sexual assault kit collected for (DNA) testing ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provide Mr. Sayed with a procedural due process to have exculpatory (DNA) evidence tested
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent Colorado to respond filed.
2019-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Colorado
L. Andrew Cooper — Office of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent
Hazhar Sayed
Hazhar A. Sayed — Petitioner