Whether the trial Court violated the defendants protected constitutional rights by abusing its discretion where in parsing out Appellant's arguement it decision which is contrary to law, essentially was effectively a rendered a miscarriage of justice.

Whether the trial court by miscalculating the total amount sent to the defendant, where as only 90% of $1,003, not 90% of $1313.99 should have been taken, for reimbursement, based on the judges decision, the defendant should be returned the amount of $278.00.

Whether the trial court erred by not applying the Michigan administrative rule 791.6639, which states that whereas the evidence shows that the funds in question was accumulated over a 8 year period a prisoner can accumulate funds without limits.

Whether the trial court erred by considering the funds in question "Assets" whereas as the evidence shows that these funds were a loan and by law, loans are considered debt act assets.

Whether the trial court violated the defendant's constitutional rights by abusing its discretion in rendering a decision contrary to law, resulting in a miscarriage of justice