No. 19-7224
Cheryl Jones v. Stephen Goldberg, et al.
IFP
Tags: borrower-rights civil-procedure civil-rights document-falsification due-process foreclosure fraud legal-rights lender-fraud lender-practices property-law standing
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. WHEN A LENDER PRESENTS FALSE DOCUMENTS AND WINS A
FINAL JUDGEMENT, DOES THIS VIOLATE THE RIGHTS OF
THE BORROWER?
2. WHEN THE BORROWERIS NOT GIVEN THE RIGHT TO A
DISCOVERYTIME TO REVIEW AND PRESENT EVIDENCE OF
THHS FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT IS THE COURT SUPPORTING
BUSINESSES IN ILLEGAL PRACTICE?
3. DOES THE LENDERHAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO FILE
FORCLOSURE PROCEEDDINGS WITH AN EXPIRED LEIN
DOCUMENT?
4. IS THE LENDER OBLIGATED BY LAW TO NOTIFY THE
BORROWER/OCCUPANTS OF THE PROPERTY BEING
FORECLOSED?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a lender presents false documents and wins a final judgement, does this violate the rights of the borrower?
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2019-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2020)
Attorneys
Cheryl Jones
Cheryl Jones — Petitioner