No. 19-7223
Erik Bilal Khan v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: arraignment counsel-duty criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance lesser-crimes plea-bargaining prejudice prejudice-standard reasonable-probability right-to-counsel
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the right of a defendant to the effective assistance of counsel at every critical stage of a criminal proceeding, including arraignment, encompass the duty of counsel to advise the defendant of his option to plead guilty at an arraignment, and if the defendan
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether counsel was ineffective in misadvising and interfering with the defendant's choice of plea at the arraignment
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2020)
2019-11-06
Application (19A493) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 3, 2020.
2019-10-26
Application (19A493) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 4, 2019 to January 3, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Erik Khan
Erik Bilal Khan — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent