No. 19-722
Larry J. Hudack v. La Cresta Property Owners Association
Response Waived
Tags: anti-slapp anti-SLAPP-statute civil-procedure collateral-attack due-process federal-statute first-amendment jurisdiction jurisdictional-defect right-to-petition standing state-statute void-judgment void-judgments
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is a collateral attack on void judgments, on its face, an assault on the constitutional Right to Petition under any state or federal statute?
2. Do claims of protected conduct relieve a court of its constitutional duty to rule on the issue submitted in a collateral attack?
3. Does Church establish precedent that a collateral attack is subject to strike under California's controversial anti-SLAPP statute?
4. Can a California Court of Appeal review a void judgment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a collateral attack on void judgments, on its face, an assault on the constitutional Right to Petition under any state or federal statute?
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent LaCresta Poperty Owners Association to respond filed.
2019-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 6, 2020)
Attorneys
LaCresta Poperty Owners Association
Constance Trinh — Whitney Petchul, Respondent
Larry J. Hudack
Larry J. Hudack — Petitioner