No. 19-7216
Daniel A. Ramet v. Robert LeGrande, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-defense criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel lafler-v-cooper legal-malpractice plea-bargaining sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
If a defense attorney advises a client to reject a favorable plea offer based on a grave miscalculation about the viability of a legal defense, has the attorney provided deficient performance?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
If a defense attorney advises a client to reject a favorable plea offer based on a grave miscalculation about the viability of a legal defense, has the attorney provided deficient performance?
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-28
Waiver of right of respondents Robert LeGrande, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2020)
2019-11-20
Application (19A573) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 3, 2020.
2019-11-18
Application (19A573) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 4, 2019 to January 3, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Daniel Ramet
Jeremy Baron — Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
Robert LeGrande, et al.
Heather Diane Procter — Respondent