SHOULD PETITIONERS NOTICE OF APPEAL HAVE BEEN CONSTRUED AS A REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ON GROUNDS 1-12 AND 14-15, AND WAS FAILURE TO CONSTRUE THE NOTICE OF APPEAL VIOLATIVE OF PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW PURSUANT TO THE U.S. CONST. AMEND 14™.

WHETHER THE UNITED STATES ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL APPLIED STRICKLANDS PREJUDICE UNREASONABLE TO PETITIONER'S CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL FOR FAILURE TO PRESERVE BATSON ISSUE FOR APPEALPRONG

Should petitioners notice of appeal have been construed as a request for a certificate of appealability on grounds 1-12 and 14-15, and was failure to construe the notice of appeal violative of petitioner's due process and equal protection of law pursuant to the US const. amend 14?