No. 19-7196

Mark D. Zimmerman v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2020-01-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts asset-forfeiture civil-procedure civil-rights discovery discovery-rights due-process incarceration judicial-discretion legal-resources pro-se standing state-courts supervisory-power
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2020-03-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

its Supervisory Power over the lower State Court's sanctining of
a departure from the aicepted ard usual course of judicial
proceedings in regards to the decision governing Grayson County
Jail's derial of acless to a law library while Petitioner was
proceeding pro se.

Petitioner's personal bank account at Chase Bark being frozen or
put on hold without a warrant, subpeona or court order being
issued is part of a Civil Asset Forfeiture Proceeding and also
without the Bank Account in question ever being listed on any
document to be seized or frozen.

# 3.
Petitioner Moves that this honorable court exercise its Supervisory
power over the lower state court's sanctioning of it's denial of
Petitioner's Multiple Pro Se Motions for discovery while simutaneously
beis e .

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower state court erred in sanctioning the petitioner's departure from the accepted judicial proceedings regarding the decision governing Grayson County's denial of access to a law library while the petitioner was proceeding pro se

Docket Entries

2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2019-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2020)
2019-09-17
Application (19A310) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 16, 2019.
2019-09-06
Application (19A310) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 17, 2019 to December 16, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Mark Zimmerman
Mark D. Zimmerman — Petitioner