DOES THE READING OF 28 U.S.C. § 2244(A) CREATE AMBIGUITY IN 28 U.S.C. § 2244(D)(A) READ IN PART "A ONE YEAR PERIOD OF LIMITATION SHALL APPLY TO AN APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN CUSTODY PURSUANT TO THE JUDGMENT OF A STATE COURT. THE LIMITATION PERIOD SHALL RUN FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THE JUDGMENT BECOME FINAL BY THE CONCLUSION OF DIRECT REVIEW"?

WAS THE TOLLING TIME BEGINNING TO RUN AGAIN AT THE MANDATE DATE?

IS THE STATE OF MISSOURI INTENTIONALLY MISCONSTRUING 28 USC § 2244(D)(A) TO DENY PROTECTED UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS SECURED UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT? AND/OR IS DISTRICT JUDGE ORTRIE A. SMITH ALLOWING ADOPTING THE STATE OF MISSOURI'S MISCONSTRUE INTERPRETATION OF 28 USC § 2244(D)(A) IN ORDER TO PREVENT THE MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE?

DID JACKSON COUNTY MISSOURI DIV. L6 CIRCUIT JUDGE YOUNES CREATE AN IMPEDIMENT BY FAILING TO INFORM WALKER HE HAD BEEN GRANTED LEAVE TO PERFECT HIS 29.15 APPEAL AS A POOR PERSON, THEREBY CREATING AN EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL SITUATION?

Does the reamme of 28 U.S.C. 2244(d) and (p) create ambiguity in 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(1) regarding the one-year period of litigation