1. Whether the Appendix A has discretionary jurisdiction to review A decision expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of the Appendix B on the same question of law See. Art. V., (b)(3) Fla Const; Fla R. App. 9.120 (a), 9.030(b) (1) (a) (b) (c) (2) (a) (b) (3) (4) (a) (b)

2. How important for the Appendix A to have a Petition Writ of Certiorari to look at the lower court ruling for non-final (interlocutory) decisions according to 28 U.S.C. &1292, and 28 U.S.C.&1291, gives jurisdiction of appeals of final decisions by district courts to the courts of appeals in most cases.

3. U.S. Code & 1257. State Courts; Certiorari (a) Final Judgments or decrees Rendered by the highest court of a state in which a decision could be had may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by Writ of Certiorari where the validity of a treaty or statue of any state is drawn in question on the ground of it's being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, or where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is specially set up or claimed under the Constitution or the treaties or statutes of, or any commission held, or authority exercised under, the United States.

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause requires States to recognize same-sex marriages validly performed in other States