Curry Robinson v. Barry Smith, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Houtzdale, et al.
I- WHETHER THE FEDERAL QUESTION OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL AS
THETPEESERVED CLAIM OF AN ALIBI WAS VAGUE?AND/OR UNEXHAUSTED THEREBY
PROCEDURALLY BARRING THE PETITIONER FROM FEDERAL REVIEW?
(a) Whether the Petitioner's 6th and 14th amendment rights were violated
wien the District court failed to determine whether Petitioner's
federal claim of ineffectiveness was properly present and not vagus?TO
(b) The district court abused its discretion when it failed
finding of whether the PCRA court based its decision
unreasonable determination of facts regarding K.M.
with respect to Petitioner's county jail stay?to make a
on a
T.M. and T.T.>
Whether the federal question of ineffective assistance of trial counsel as the preserved claim of an alibi was vague and/or unexhausted thereby procedurally barring the petitioner from federal review?