1) Reasonable jurists would debate that appellate counsel was ineffective
for failing to raise a plain error of fact material to Leon's third
exception, which would have not permitted a good-faith finding, had it
been factored, where, inter alia:
The underlying affidavit for search warrant didn't 'merely emit'
the address-actually-searched, in fact, a completely different
address of "1000 Mian Street" (PageID:85, Exhibit D) was averred
as the location where "evidence of criminal activity will be found
at..." (PageID:85, Exhibit D), thus in fact, rendering the affidavit
'bare bones' as to the warrant's "709 Elberon Av." (PagelD: 82,
Exhibit E) address-actually-searched.

Whether appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a plain error of fact material to Leon's third exception, which would have not permitted a good-faith finding