No. 19-7159
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy v. Garth Gulick, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure due-process service-of-process standing statute-of-limitations waiver
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Are waiving defendants since of mns r ty requd to cimpy w Fe.
CN. P. IAli or (2ol (A) when fng timely anwe? And f me anwer a hn tey ont n aner imey the dys er the requet for wawer of stenie of summors is sest to deferdants.
Can the Apellak cout cnnder for the hiot time on ppeal a doferdants arument of e nget s a od c o e dict (I(A) if it want prestirved in the thal cort or pled and provn as plan eror" in the appllok procedings?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appellate court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims due to lack of timely service of process and whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the petitioner's motion to extend the time for service of process
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-10
Waiver of right of respondents Garth Gulick, et al. to respond filed.
2019-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Garth Gulick, et al.
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy — Petitioner