No. 19-7156
Robert E. Clayborne v. Brad Hansen, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process false-arrest habeas-corpus jurisdiction standing unlawful-detention
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
whit of habeas lor pus are not
in his petition fer
junsdichonal
defects
and then crdered that the
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's allegations of set-up for a false arrest petition for writ of habeas corpus are valid
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent Brad Hansen to respond filed.
2019-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Brad Hansen
Stacy Marie Foust — Nebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Robert E. Clayborne
Robert Earl Clayborne Jr. — Petitioner