First Question:
Whether Sixth Circuit's precedent supersedes and
adoption of district court's arbitrary abuse of
authority, prohibits petitioner's 28 USC 2241's
statutory and/or procedural constitutional
actual Iffiumacenace issme(s) merits claimed
isn't writ issuance permitted, because
Supreme Court's decisions never
reviewed or decidedly ruled
on those particular
issue'(s) merits use
or applicability
on 2241' s
vehicle ?

Second Question:
Whether district court's Article III improperly sentenced petitioner's actual innocence absence, in violation of
statutory and procedural 5,6,14 amendments
constitution demandingly requires,:a
unanimous jury's verdict finding
any statutory charging elements
arid/br facts which he's charged and
violated before guilty finding,
i and is double jeopardy
prohibited retrial by
accepted-impeached
verdict finding ?

Third Question:
Whether trial and sentencing counsel'(s) cause not objection and demanding for,
after district court's accepted finding, absence
non-unanimous jury's verdict finding any statutory
charging lement(s) and/or fact(s) before or at
sentencing and requiring petitioner's actual
innocence discharge with prejudice, is
prejudicial 5,6,14 amendment's
ineffectiveness ?

Fourth Question:
Whether appellate counsel's cause not raising or arguing, including
trial counsel'(s) ineffectiveness objection and demanding for,
absence unanimous jury's verdict finding any statutory
charging element(s) and/or fact(s), on direct appeal
is prejudicial 5,6,14 amendment's ineffectiveness ?

Whether Sixth Circuit's precedent supersedes and adoption of district court's arbitrary abuse of authority, prohibits petitioner's 28 USC 2241's statutory and/or procedural constitutional actual immocence issue(s) merits claimed