No. 19-7119
Larry Bell v. Kevin Ransom, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeals appellate-review civil-procedure due-process federal-rule-60b federal-rules-of-civil-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-review jurisdiction legal-standard slack-v-mcdaniel standing third-circuit
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER REASONABLE JURIST COULD DEBATE THE THIRD
CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ADOPTION THAT THE DISTRICT
COURT'S RULING THAT APPELLANT WAS NOT ENTITLED TO
RELIEF ON THE BASIS OF HIS APRIL 2018 MOTION FILED
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b)
WHILE CITING Slack v. McDaniel . 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);
Morris . 187 F.3d at 341?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-reasonable-jurist-could-debate-third-circuit-court-of-appeals-adoption
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-16
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-22
Waiver of right of respondents Ransom, Supt., Dallas SCI, et al. to respond filed.
2019-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 30, 2020)
2019-10-01
Application (19A353) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until December 23, 2019.
2019-09-23
Application (19A353) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 22, 2019 to December 21, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. (Justice Alito is recused.)
Attorneys
Larry Bell
Larry L. Bell — Petitioner
Ransom, Supt., Dallas SCI, et al.
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent