Where a plaintiffs position falls within the scope of an open
Legislative statement such as PA Code Title 18 Section 911 (a) (6); "in
order to successfully resist and eliminate this situation, it is necessary to
provide new remedies and procedures ". Can the open ended nature of the
statement be used to offset long established rules for the achievement of
legal doctrine capable of addressing specific threats to person, family,
business, community, state, and nation and in the process provide absolute
and direct due process to "pro se out of necessity " parties who need to
address the courts directly, due to threat from racketeering, inchoate crimes,
criminal organizations, and organized crime.

Where a plaintiff's position falls within the scope of an open Legislative statement, can the open ended nature of the statement be used to offset long established rules for the achievement of legal doctrine capable of addressing specific threats to person, family, business, community, state, and nation and in the process provide absolute and direct due process to 'pro se out of necessity' parties who need to address the courts directly, due to threat from racketeering, inchoate crimes, criminal organizations, and organized crime?