No. 19-7083
Leroy L. Perdue v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 851-enhancement criminal-procedure due-process enhancement federal-statute notice role-adjustment sentencing sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines statutory-compliance statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the sentence should be vacated for failure comply with the requirements of 21 U.S.C. § 851(b).
2. Whether the court erred in assessing a four level enhancement for role in the offense.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the sentence should be vacated for failure comply with the requirements of 21 U.S.C. § 851(b)
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2020-01-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2020)
Attorneys
Leroy Perdue
Alan Hideto Yamamoto — Law Offices of Alan H. Yamamoto, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent