WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN (1) APPLYING THIS COURT'S HOLDING IN BELL ATLANTIC CORP. V. TWOMBLY, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT'S COMPLAINT WHEN THIS COURT'S HOLDING IN ERICKSON V. PARDUS, 551 U.S. 89 (2007) CONTROLLED,

(2) WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED WHEN IT DENIED PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE SUPPORTING EVIDENCE THAT HER MENTAL ILLNESS ENTITLED HER TO EQUITABLE TOLLING, IN CONFLICT WITH THIS COURT'S HOLDING IN HAINES V. KERNER, 404 U.S. 520 (1972),

(3) WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S RULING CONFLICTS WITH THE MAJORITY OF RULINGS BY FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURTS PERTAINING TO CLAIMS OF MENTAL ILLNESS, AND

(4) WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN TRANSFERRING PETITIONER'S CASE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE WITHOUT HER CONSENT, CONTRARY TO 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).

Whether the lower court erred in applying Twombly to pro-se plaintiff's complaint when Erickson controlled