No. 19-7053
Jason Dean Barnes v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-disclosure constitutional-infirmity digital-technologies good-faith-exception law-enforcement magistrate-judge magistrate-review warrant warrant-infirmity
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether and in what circumstances the good-faith exception should apply in cases involving emerging digital technologies when law enforcement officers technically disclose a crucial fact that would reveal a warrant's constitutional infirmity, but do so in a way that makes it difficult for a magistrate judge to detect or understand the infirmity?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether and in what circumstances the good-faith exception should apply in cases involving emerging digital technologies when law enforcement officers technically disclose a crucial fact that would reveal a warrant's constitutional infirmity, but do so in a way that makes it difficult for a magistrate judge to detect or understand the infirmity?
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2020-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2020)
Attorneys
Jason Dean Barnes
Jenny L Devine — Office of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent