No. 19-7050

In Re Charlene Rosa

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-12-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeal civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review sanctions statutory-interpretation witness-testimony
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)

Wter the Foh ct con pel bue i

1. discretion in sanction the petitioner

Whether the Founth OcH Erceed it Authonty in sancion The petitioner.

A Discovened Evidence clams) fied in a tmely 3 8so motion Thee exceptions to the two-yor period o lirnitations:l) mewly discovened evidence - the Pats to which the clain is predicated dere unknown to the movant and could not halle been a scertained by the exarcise of due diligence y Mew mule o La-the Fundamental Conddudinal wight assented was not efalishedwithin the wo-yoar pertod lintadions nd has been held to applyretroocuely that was dendby the hjudci Crcut count and ondered anddued That the dendant had 3o days to fe an Appeal Reitciner filed eAc t Public Defender to assist in the Appeal.

Whither Sanctrion was Melessary.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Koweth, Oortrick Covert 4 wypptooll abuse dy duration M Sombion Hh lod decmaye

Docket Entries

2020-08-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-07-09
DISTRIBUTED.
2020-03-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-11-14
Petition for a writ of prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2020)

Attorneys

Charlene Rosa
Charlene Rosa — Petitioner