No. 19-7049
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claim criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance personal-liberty pro-se-petition punishment standing strickland-standard undue-delay
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Appellant is being deprived of his civil right of personal liberty against law contrary to the Constitution and Laws of the United States.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner is being deprived of his civil rights due to undue delay in appellate ruling
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2020-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-12-06
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2020)
Attorneys
Antwoyn Spencer
Antwoyn Spencer — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent