after the panel determine the district court
ERRED BY CONSTRUING DARWICH'S MOTION AS A
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED UNDER LOCAL
RULE 7.1(h)(1)ARE THE PANEL SHALL REMANDED
THE CASE BACK TO THE DISTRICT COURT ?

IF THE DISTRICT COURT NEVER DENIED OR GRANT
RULE 60(B)(6) DID THE PANEL ERRED TO REVIEW
FOR AN ABUSE OF DISCRECTION? OR THE PANELS
ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 20, 2019 UNDER LACK OF
JURISDICTION TO DO SO ?.

ARE THE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT ERRED
OF HOLDING THE DISTICT COURT ERRED BY CONSTUING
RULE 60(b)(6) UNDER MOTION OF RECONSIDERATION
FILED UNDER LOCAL RULE 7.1(h)(1) ? AFTER THE
PANELS DITERMING DARWICH MOTION 60(b)(6) THE
PANELS UNDER LACK OF JURISDICTION TO RULE ON
THE MOTION RULE 60(b)(6) BECAUSE THE DISTRICT
COURT FIRST SAHLL RULE ON DARWICH MOTION ?

Petitioner Question the Court of Appeals after
determine Darwich Case under rule 60 (b)(6)shall
remanded the case back to the district court to
make ruling " Dened or Grant " after the District
£ourt make ruling the Appeals court under power of "Jurisdiction . Petitioner Claim the Sixth Circuit
of appeal panel under lack of jurisdiction to rule
on darwich case of rule 60(b)(6).

Whether the panel erred in construing Darwich's motion as a motion for reconsideration under local rule 7.1(h)(1) and remanding the case back to the district court