(1). Whether, in fairness to judicial proceedings, can an attorney of record brazenly ignore his client's instructions during the Direct Appeal process and not violate his federal constitutional right of effective assistance of counsel?

(2). Whether a federal judge can use his position of authoritative legal power to control a malicious prosecution to support his own personal gain as supported by the irrefutable fact that FBI witness tampering was allowed and the "honorable" judge restrained a fatally defective indictment, magnifying fraud upon his own court?

Whether malicious and vindictive prosecution threatens the criminal justice system