Is The Admittance Of Irrelevant And Prejudicial Bad Acts Evidence Under The Guise Of Michigan Rule Of Evidence 404(B) A Violation Of Due Process And A Fair Trial Pursuant To The U.S. Const. Ams. V, XIV; Mich. Const. 1963, Art. 1, §17?

Where The Petitioner's Convictions For CSC 1 And 2 Where Obtained On The Basis Of Legally Insufficient Evidence, Does Due Process Require Reversal, Pursuant To U.S Const., Ams., V, VI, XIV; Mich. Const. 1963, Art. 1, § 17 And 20?

Was Petitioner Denied His Constitutional Right To The Effective Assistance Of Counsel Where A Multitude Of Inactions On The Part Of Trial Counsel, Denied Him A Fair Trial Proceeding, Pursuant To U.S. Const., Amends Vi, Xiv; Mich. Const. 1963, Art. 1, §20?

Is the admittance of irrelevant and prejudicial bad acts evidence under the guise of Michigan Rule of Evidence 404(b) a violation of due process and a fair trial pursuant to the U.S. Const. Ams. V, XIV; Mich. Const. 1963, Art. 1, §17?