1.) Whether Third Circuit Court of Appeal Judge's apply
the Standard Under Timely 60(C)(1) from the Doc. 115
Jan. 26, 2018 District Court Opinion. See( Doc. 129 1-4 and 18-21.

2) . Whether Third Circuit Court of Appeal Judge's Abuse
of Discretion For Not Staying Mandate on Doc. 82
Filed 1/27/17 page 5. Doc. 200 is pending in District
Court on this issue under "McCoy v. Louisiana. No. 16-
8255". Grim. No. l.:ll-CR-292 and Doc. 129 at i5 and 17.

3) . Whether Third Circuit of Appeal Judge's Erred by Not
Addressing Doc. 130 District Court Opinion Nov. 19,
2018 page 1-2 and Doc. 129 page 15 "Discovery".

4) . Whether Third Circuit Court of Appeal Judge's Erred by
Not Addressing Doc. 134 Under Fine and Cost on No. 18-
1352 and 18-3602 Double Jeopardy Theory. See(Rutledge v. US)

5) . Whether Question Before Supreme Court Under Banister v.
Davis,(No. 18-6943), granted Cert. June 24, 2019, Whether
A Rule 59(e) Motion In A § 2255 proceeding is subject to
the Second or Successive Rules of the Gonzalez.v. Crosby,
Now Petitioner Question at 1-2. See(Folk v. Prime Care Medical; 771 Fed. Appx. 141; 2019 IJ.S. App. Lexis 18293
No. 18-3602 June 18, 2019) and Petition For Rehearing
Denied on 7/30/19.

Whether Third Circuit Court of Appeal Judges applied the correct standard under Rule 60(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure