Robert C. Denham, Jr. v. James Dzurenda, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
I. (a)
Is whether or not Plaintiff s Reply, Motions 7 Affidavit
to Screening Order dated 01-09-19 was timely, and satisfied
the $75, 000 amount-in-controversy requirement pursuant
to 28 U.S;C. § 1332(a)(1), to File Amended Complaint?
(Id Appx "E, El, E2").
II.
Is whether or not Plaintiff s Motion to proceed informa
pauperis pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1-915, to Proposed Amended
Plaintiffs 42 U.S.C. § 1983,1985(2) Civil Rights Complaint,
was given an -opportunity to heard on subject-matter jurisdiction?
{Id Appx "E")
Is whether or not Plaintiffs Reply Motions Affidavit to Screening Order dated 01-09-19 was timely, and satisfied the $75,000 amount-in-controversy requirement pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332(a)(1), to File Amended Complaint?