Reasonable jurists would determine that Mr. Constance was denied a fair and impartial trial with the State Courts denial concerning hearsay testimony;

Reasonable jurists would conclude that the State obtained Mr. Constance's conviction with insufficient evidence;

Reasonable jurists would conclude that Mr. Constance was denied effective assistance of counsel during trial and Appeal.

Whether Mr. Constance was denied a fair and impartial trial due to the State Courts' denial of hearsay testimony