Was The Presiding Magistrate's Analysis So Flawed As To Warrent This Court To Reverse And Remand So That A Correct Legal Standard May Be Applied ? pg7.I

Did The Government Waive Its Procedural Default Argument By Failing To Raise That Argument In The District Court During The Relevant Pre-Trial, And Trial Hearings Pursuant To Established Precedent In Faretta V CA. 422 U.S. (1972)? pg.f.II

Was There A Departure From Established pro-se Liberal Pleading Standards Resulting In Violation of Due Process ? pg 10.Ill

Was The Lower Courts Reasons (or lack there of) For Denying Petitioner A Certificate Of Appealability "COA" Flawed ? pgll .IV

Was The Government's Legal Standard Grounded On Faretta v California 422 US 805 (1972) And Cook v Ryan 688 F3d 601 (9th Cir 2012) Flawed As To Warrant Remand >? pg 12.V

Was The District court's Decision Adopting The Magistrate's Report And Recommandation So Flawed As To Compell Summary Reversal And Remand To Correct A manifest Injustice ? pg 19VI

Did A Fundamental Miscarriage Of Justice Occur When The Lower Court's Failed To Correctly Apply Controlling/Supreme Courtc-Precedent Contrary To Massaro v United States 538 U.S. 500 (2003) ? pg 20.. VII

VIII Was 21 USCS § 846 And 21 USCS § 841 A (a)(1) Unconstitu tionally Applied To Petitioner, Rendering Petitioner Actually Innocent Of A Violation Of Those Statutes ? pg 24.

Was the presiding magistrate's analysis so flawed as to warrant this court to reverse and remand so that a correct legal standard may be applied?