No. 19-6963

Roland A. Prenatt v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-12-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment attorney-accountability civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-suppression fourth-amendment mental-health probable-cause search-and-seizure sixth-amendment-speedy-trial,due-process,right-to- speedy-trial
Latest Conference: 2020-06-25 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

If the sixth amendment of the us, consfitotion quarantees the accused, the right to a speedy trial, then why does the Judge and Attorney feel they have the right to waire it against the accuseds wishes?So many people have their rights violated like this every years and its a vidation of their rights under the sixth amendment!

2) Does the judge have the right to ignore the accused's right to go pros, and ot have a frretta Inqury when it was requested?

3.) If the accuseds lawyer fails to file a direct appeal as reqyested,by the accused, thew why does the accused get dewied whew he tries to file a belated appeal when his attorney meglected to do his job by filing a direct appeal wher it was requested by the acused?"

4.) why isit the accsed's attorney held accountable for such a long history of mental health problems?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the accused the right to a speedy trial, and why the judge and attorney can waive this right against the accused's wishes?

Docket Entries

2020-06-29
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-03-16
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2020)

Attorneys

Roland A. Prenatt
Roland A. Prenatt — Petitioner