1. Mou ow. Skote Dudtelal Cirevik Courk cekuse »_peovid, Aottce cond oo henclag pursuant by due FIC, Darensmark bo We Unik Shakes Corstitvitn when o dectstn beface _ _™ a Stoke Sudtctal CireuTk Covet order Hy | com wit ana at of & person by am -Shebe Deporkmert ab . L Menke 'realy Foc & suleg bun tOa\ Qucatlsn "of Kane. ' Lenskend g¥ erov\sian gt wanted noktce ond a | Heotine Qs ceguesbed oy pebiWner by Ene Couck ¢

3. Meas Yyuibstte. s&_wccrss to wdeqvele care Grr oe . Dorn) wnrd bleeding wovnd Park 9 PRcSOA su FFere ond [An Couck te Aceo bly awore denlal of access by oa evb\he_ ond SPrery bal an} detention of sobd eersan | les aults\,_ cause Poe dts miss al of Drury es undac_ conta Ks E

Lt. | Nowy Wis Covek oder Foe Ue dhemlssal of Worges agminst re person accusel, oc order Por | vine Respondent by ordec nr Stroma on weit of ayisttas

Whether a state judicial circuit court's refusal to provide notice and a hearing pursuant to the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution when a decision before the state judicial circuit court orders the commitment of a person by a state department of mental health violates the petitioner's constitutional rights