Dan Haendel v. Anne Reed, et al.
1. Does Heck v. Humphrey bar Appellant's federal court review of the constitutionality of actions by local Virginia investigative and law enforcement officials in violation of the plain language of the Virginia Intercep tion Act pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment's due process guarantee?
2. Is an Alford plea equivalent to a guilty plea for pur poses of providing an exception to Heck v. Humphrey bar as provided by cases in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit?
3. Is a guilty or Alford plea not an intelligent, know ing and voluntary plea in violation of defendant's con stitutional right to a fair trial where a defendant has no access to legal resources and/or his attorneys' fail ure to inform him of a Virginia statue's pre-trial sup pression motion for disclosure and/or use of evidence obtained by an interception of electronic communica tions, even if the interception itself is not illegal, the plain language of the statute provides that disclosure and/or use of such interception by law enforcement of ficials constitutes a felony?
Does Heck v. Humphrey bar Appellant's federal court review of the constitutionality of actions by local Virginia investigative and law enforcement officials in violation of the plain language of the Virginia Interception Act pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment's due process guarantee?