DID THE TRIAL/LOWER COURT CREATE A MANIFEST INJUSTICE WHEN IT ALLOWED THE PETITIONER TO PLEA TO CHARGES THAT VIOLATED DOUBLE JEOPARDY LAWS, WHEN THE TRIAL COURT FAILED IN ITS MINISTERIAL DUTY TO ENSURE THAT THE PETITIONER RECEIVED A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL SENTENCING HEARING AND WHEN THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO INCLUDE IN THE PETITIONER'S PLEA AGREEMENT; VIOLATING THE PETITIONER'S FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?

Did the trial/lower court create a manifest injustice when it allowed the petitioner to plea to charges that violated double-jeopardy laws, when the trial court failed in its ministerial duty to ensure that the petitioner received a fair and impartial sentencing hearing and when the trial court failed to include in the petitioner's plea agreement, violating the petitioner's fifth and fourteenth amendment rights of the united states constitution?