No. 19-6952
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy v. Judy Gilmore, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure default-judgment due-process federal-rules procedural-compliance service-of-process standing summons time-limitation time-limits timely-answer waiver
Latest Conference:
2020-01-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
After waning deferdnts sirvice of summons, ore they
1.
requred to comply
with
FeD.R. C.. P. (a(A) or 12C (A i When Gg
timely answers? And if
me anouer is Fed. R. Cv. P. 12lal Alil, waud deferdonts
affirmate deferses be waived
and gult admited wher they dont hie on anwer hiely fn the o days aftr e
request for wawer of sence of summons is sent to detercknts.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether defendants must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1)(F) and timely answer after waiving service of summons
Docket Entries
2020-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.
2019-12-16
Waiver of right of respondent Judy Gilmore, et al. to respond filed.
2019-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 15, 2020)
Attorneys
Judy Gilmore, et al.
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Sir Giorgio Sanford Clardy
Giorgio Sanford Clardy — Petitioner