No. 19-6943
Sheila Annette Cunningham v. Florida Credit Union
IFP
Tags: burden-of-proof civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights curtilage discrimination due-process employment equal-protection fourth-amendment investigative-authority law-enforcement search-and-seizure standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
Immigration LaborRelations
Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the District Court erred in holding that Cunningham failed to provide evidence of racial discrimination.
Whether the District Court erred in holding that Cunningham failed to identify Similarly Situated Comparators outside of her racial class who were treated less favorably.
Whether the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that State and local government employees may sue their employer for retaliation and discrimination in the work place.
Whether the Federal Courts, only heard the side of the employer favorably?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Jistia Couvt Cured Mol ding | Heat Curnningham Failes to prvite evidence of racial diSciminaton
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-07-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Sheila Annette Cunningham
Sheila Annette Cunningham — Petitioner