No. 19-6924
William D. Thomas v. Mark McCullick, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bail civil-procedure confrontation confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process eyewitness-identification identification indictment officer-activity police-conduct preliminary-hearing warrant-inquiry whether a state's failure to meet the reciprocal r
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
a one on one Confrontation during a preliminary hearng tanted by prior police activity is Sufficient to warrant a Caurt's reliability inquiry.
II. Whether a States failure to meect the reciprocal requirements of it's alibi statute is a Violation of the Due Process Clause Where a defendant has already Complied wilh the same mandatory requirements.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an identification resulting from a show-up confrontation during a preliminary hearing raised by prior police activity is sufficient to warrant a court's evidentiary inquiry
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent Mark McCullick, Warden to respond filed.
2019-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Mark McCullick, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
William D. Thomas
William D. Thomas — Petitioner