I.
THE COURT OF APPEALS CLEARLY ERRED IN
UPHOLDING THE DISTRICT COURT'S RULING
ADMITTING EVIDENCE AT DEFENDANT'S TRIAL WHICH
VIOLATED BOTH THE HEARSAY RULE AND
DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION

II.
THE COURT OF APPEALS CLEARLY ERRED IN
UPHOLDING THE DISTRICT COURT'S FINDING OF
JURISDICTION SOLEY BASED ON A DEPARTMENT OF
STATE CERTIFICATION AND IN FAILING TO SUBMIT THE
ISSUE OF JURISDICTION TO THE JURY

Whether the court of appeals erred in upholding the admission of evidence that violated the hearsay rule and the defendant's confrontation rights