No. 19-69
Diane B. Weissburg v. Los Angeles Unified School District, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: anti-slapp civil-rights due-process educational-rights iep-meetings official-proceedings privacy-law public-interest recording recording-consent recording-rights retaliation
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
This is a matter of first impression in the Federal and California Court systems.
1. Are Individual Educational Placement ("IEP") meetings Official Proceedings?
2. Do parents have the right to record IEP meetings, and use the content of those recorded IEP meetings in subsequent court actions?
3. Is an IEP meeting an "issue of public interest."
4. Whether a parent, guardian, or local educational agency has a right under federal law to audio record IEP meetings and use the content of those recordings, without fear of retribution?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are Individual Educational Placement (IEP) meetings Official Proceedings?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-26
Waiver of right of respondent Los Angeles Unified School District to respond filed.
2019-07-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 12, 2019)
Attorneys
Diane B. Weissburg, Esq.
Diane Barbara Weissburg — Weissburg Law Firm, Petitioner
Los Angeles Unified School District
Sue Ann Salmon Evans — Dannis Woliver Kelley, Respondent