1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit abused its discretion by requiring allegations not contained in Chapter 397 and by denying petitioners' motion to certify diapositive questions of first impression to the Florida Supreme Court when resolving the duty to defend without guidance from the courts of Florida.

2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit's decision reflected a clear misapprehension of summary judgement standards in precedent like Tolan v. Cotton, 572 U.S. 650 (2014), and violated Rule 56(c) by rejecting applicable facts.

Whether the Eleventh Circuit abused its discretion by requiring allegations not contained in Chapter 397 and by denying petitioners' motion to certify dispositive questions of first impression to the Florida Supreme Court when resolving the duty to defend without guidance from the courts of Florida