Oo&* VY\e. >Ox/-\VV\ Cxv/COxY C-OO v/A- O y -Af>y>eo,,\6
\ ov/i>>^ i g U o\r\ Vo .£ v fin V .AVe. Ve. x V 0 cx\ __V\oxv e.
C-0-WA\A x o>v:vW:>A
<3% o,S 4C, ,9344 WY(3ACP\ esVa\o\'xoVeA
V) \i... (A "S'A O. V >of
cy ov 9e,Vv Vv<x^e\AS \fe.qoee,Y V>y G Ovoq v. e 6S
OLO^ViOv-iZaUov-N Vo yx\e a Sec.o\n^ o^r Socc.ess,\/e.Yu.A
y <Xr
Lx> V V Y o y V> (X Ao -We C.ov'-f?o^> *
lYe\y, Vo vfe. v e\A V \ VvS
V v ,vno.:eAy__ _yx\ .. vVc. A Y?y VVe. \ ~ \j
5ec Uov^ 9944 0<W DC AY, wo Ov/Geo- \o Cxc^o^ecxy?f \ \ e-aA x on
Av^V'-WC-V C-Oc?V" Y \y\ Ae c\4> . * vrx y ovey \ vx v
6 e a V - eo»r
^ Yv/ve of
CX yp e,Vx \x<x ~x «v y v/owo Wx^ Ov^e
Q'^f 'o^Vov^ xYy Vo DacjC ay^e<2. - sYoo^ia
G o\\a\ e^oY OvVVoxcH *57
3, Oo&3 VA'-no -3 vx/^YAo .Gw cOv V Coo^ Y 0\* A'xp^peo.A^
Vnoxx ! e. ^ Yc V> Ov-,
COWYWO G\0 As Of
Vy Co,-'NCjv/e65 | V)y
\.v> We, „
A e\ vvx vVo C\\/-covv\ v evo Y We VexVvjcxX
3& 0.6,0, 3944 C \o) ( 9A C AY, €*5\<Yb A.WeA
SoY>vSYi Vo V\v^2 \Vs ol0\o cxo VAtx
CA <£ Ov" ^ v C£> Vo. Y) X \ >5 V ® A V e-\ ev o. \ A (X oO:\ O s/xy
Oce. Oyy
A V?y Wse. 0\an \e

Does the Pre-Diath Circuit Court of Appeals have jurisdiction to circumvent the statutory commands of 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3)(A), established by Congress, by denying a petitioner's request for authorization to file a second or successive application for writ of habeas corpus in the district court indefinitely, to prevent its timely filing as required by the 1-year statute of limitations of Section 2244(d)(1), in order to exclude a petitioner from his one, free-standing opportunity to wage a collateral attack?