Under the Laws and Rules of Res Judicata, ole if an issue was been litigated on and decided by the Court, would the Wish Court be departing from the essential sections of the Veto in Bilobi the Peace Cutwk to Relate on Use We Wome in the Retetionen's Case that "ke Fork erture Court Aeamitued WS. James Ubidued oWMERSHIP of "We CURBS ROY and YRowibe Wh CxPlamaTwns FoR ATS PResemoe 'vey Whe. UARy B LF RetTwntas Wal Counsel Esiled To Aoins i ot We Co~ AeEEWABETS CouMsel's abdecTion albere THE Rial CouT eared IN ex tludims VR Oxeullr tory "Wes Tynan FRom A WoVTWess AT B® Cuil PoxterTurke Beating TEST Was AcTerminad bY Te Fuss VER WoT Wo be B® WRamless ERROR BIA BRANT IS Cor AeEARNT ASTo LoYATT & Mew TAM. Shtouldicy ReTHTioner's RRRelle Te Counsel Wee Acemed INET We FoR FRNUKe "To RAR The BRIN ERROR TWRT AN ANE Tete OF "Tee Reeabd TWWNT Lons Commitigd bY Wis "TRIAL CEMNSAL THRT Lads Raised bY lle Co Aekeadmners WRElleTe Coutel WAT WBS WEA ToRbous ot HELA 3

CY MoReOWER) Swe i GARE UA Nu Swe, Ko So, BA SEH CER, Bund) "The Flowte Surkeme CoukT Rewtared w& Aoulrle PAURIER Conmietoons OF BR ALEeMARNT Lotto Souatt UBS Ucrshulll To Inte duce The PAW Testime sy of WS Go AMKENARLT Uber SeeTow Vo. So4 Qd ws) AS TRAMER "Ves Tien o€ ey UNE Cinble Lov th ess. TG TRI COURT denied Te Re Quests Oly Nepeel, The Flomde S PREM COURT Reveesed, Cow Bluduud VT We Tein CouRT eaned IK ex eluate Tite Boa ane Ue Poke, Sinace The RETMONek Biud Wig toe Adke uO ONT, SEE WYATT Nu STRTR, Ue ROO ADBOLSTT CBRE DRY HOT! LAS) nd ® SoiniT Tera Bod oth Souget Rake LW "Whe ATR DUR aug We VepTwer be eutetled "Wo Tee Same Paley wh WS Loreena iin deat Ae tanta, "Wren lwenlT" due Go WWE dot cr ComFlict ROS

Whether the essential principles of res judicata were departed from by the lower courts in allowing the prosecution to relitigate issues that were previously decided, and whether the petitioner's counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the plain error committed by the trial court in excluding exculpatory testimony