No. 19-6856
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: capital-punishment conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-considerations fair-trial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-misconduct judicial-review right-to-counsel right-to-fair-trial sentencing sentencing-discretion
Key Terms:
Punishment
Punishment
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should this court extend Its Hurst v. Florida ruling to the pre-trial and trial stages of capital murder case where it is shown that the Judge's sentencing Authority A violation of Hurst, affected the trial stages and where the judge's sentercing authority prevented him from reviewing evidence of trial counsel's gross misconduct whereby creating A conflict between that Authority and
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should Abns courct extend Ts Hucsh wv. Florida cubug
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-03-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-02-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent Delaware to respond filed.
2019-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2020)
Attorneys
Delaware
James W. Riley
James W. Riley — Petitioner