No. 19-685
Edward George McGregor v. Texas
Response RequestedRelisted (2)
Tags: credibility cross-examination due-process false-testimony materiality prosecutorial-misconduct witness-credibility
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the materiality of false testimony knowingly used by the prosecution determined by asking whether the jury would have convicted the defendant had the witnesses told the truth or by asking whether the jury would have convicted him had he been able to impeach them on cross-examination?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the materiality of false testimony knowingly used by the prosecution determined by asking whether the jury would have convicted the defendant had the witnesses told the truth or by asking whether the jury would have convicted him had he been able to impeach them on cross-examination?
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-15
Reply of petitioner Edward George McGregor filed. (Distributed)
2020-05-04
Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.
2020-04-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 4, 2020.
2020-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 20, 2020 to May 4, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 20, 2020.
2020-02-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 20, 2020 to April 20, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-21
Response Requested. (Due February 20, 2020)
2020-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 27, 2019)
Attorneys
Edward George McGregor
Randolph L. Schaffer Jr. — Petitioner
Texas
Joseph Peter Corcoran — Office of the Attorney General of Texas, Respondent
Kyle Douglas Hawkins — Texas Attorney General's Office, Respondent