No. 19-6805
Hajes Rabaia v. Gubir Grewal, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.
IFP
Tags: brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland constitutional-amendments criminal-procedure due-process evidence fourteenth-amendment judicial-review sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Under the fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendment, Does the holding of Brady v. Maryland apply to the petitioner?
1.
2. Were the decisions rendered by the Trial Court, District Court, and the Thitd Circuit Court of Appeals in complete conflict with clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States in Brady v. Maryland ? 373 U.S 82 (1963)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the holding of Brady v. Maryland apply to the petitioner?
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Hajes Rabaia
Hajes K. Rabaia — Petitioner