HAS THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT IMPLEMENTED PRATICES FOR
FLORIDN'S JUDIUAL SYSTEM THAT CONTRADICTS THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONS
T LTH AND IT AMENOMENT RGHIS FOR PRISONER'S?.

2.) DIM ThE FLORIDA SUPREME LOURTS DENIAL FoR LERTORARI REVIEW"
WHERE IAIMATE HAD NO OTHER MEANS OF APPEAL FOR EXHHAUSTING STATE
REMEDIES VIDLATE INMATE'S 1 AND 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS?,.

IS THE FLORIDA SUPREME LOURT UNONSTITUTIONALLY ALLOWING
3.)
ThE "SPENcER SANCTION " To VIOLATE oR ABRIDbE InMATES 1AMENDMENT
RIBHT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES WHEN PREMATURELY ISSUED ?.

IS THE FLORIDA SUPREME LUT ABUING T'S OBLIBATORY SUPERVISORNY
POWERS B NOT INSURING THAT NO PRISONER IS DEPRIVED OF
LIFE, LIBERTY OR PROPERTY WITHOUT BENG AFFORDED DUE PROESS OF LAW ?.

Was Jae Trois SuPR EMME Loves \\WPLEMENTED Penenites Tor Fiowak's Supiual Sygrem THAT LowTRADICTS He U.S. ConsTtTuT/ONS 1% LE ann \\N™ AMENDMENT RENTS For Prisoner's