No. 19-6744
Kevin M. Merck v. Minnesota Supreme Court, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: bank-account-seizure civil-procedure civil-rights color-of-law court-record-manipulation due-process fraud jurisdiction jurisdictional-dispute procedural-irregularity racketeering seizure standing subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2020-03-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Jurisdictional questions
Color of law questions
Questions of fraud
Questions of racketeering
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the seizure of the petitioner's bank account by Washington County, MN was lawful and justified based on the cited case of Cathy S. Jones v. Kevin M. Merck and the subsequent change to Casey Theresa Jones v. Kevin M. Merck
Docket Entries
2020-03-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-01-29
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-11
Waiver of right of respondent County of Washington, Minnesota to respond filed.
2019-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)
Attorneys
County of Washington, Minnesota
Susan S. Tice — Washington County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Kevin M. Merck
Kevin M. Merck — Petitioner