Martin Stanley Ivie v. Washington
I. QUESTIONS OF LAW
1. Is it legally pormisaible for State officials to use spurious evidence that is proven unenimously by professionel forensic enalysis to be forged in order to lereete conviotion'l of a Us Citizen?
2. Is it legally permissible for State offioials to conceal abusive police sotions by charging and convioting a Us Citizen for crimes proven to hevs not happened?
3. Is it lsgelly permissible for Stete officials to commit perjury thet diemetricslly opposes polios redio call log and Professional Rallistic Foransic records thet were openly tampered with in order to felsely frame a us Sitizen?
4. Is it legally permissible for State officisls to commit perjury by lying under oeth and concealing proof of thet freud by withholding exculpatory police Pecords and purpoeefully introducing perjured uitnese testimony?
5. Is it legelly permissible for police officers to hsrbor pereonal grudges throughout a multi-year, documented history of ebusive and embarrassing false arrests, and eot out upon thet frustretion by smbushing sn unermed us Citizan in his own private geted community, who is committing no crime, end shooting him and his dog in the back pith en automatic asseult rifle?
Whether state officials can use forged evidence to convict a U.S. citizen